Article

Quantification by Speckle Tracking at Rest and During Stress

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

The introduction of speckle tracking imaging and the opportunity to objectify regional myocardial function in an angle-independent fashion has opened a wide array of opportunities. Quantitative echocardiography is likely to reduce intra-observer variability and shorten learning curves and this will allow broader use of these new imaging modalities in clinical routine and for research purposes. Tissue Doppler is used for deformation imaging, but has disadvantages that can be overcome with 2D speckle tracking. This article briefly summarises the technical details of 2D speckle tracking (strain and strain rate) and gives an overview on current and potential future applications of this new technique at rest and during stress.

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Received:

Accepted:

Correspondence Details:Paul Erne, Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital Luzern, 6000 Luzern 16, Switzerland. E: paul.erne@ksl.ch

Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

The introduction of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) strain was a great achievement in echocardiography and for the first time allowed true quantification of regional myocardial function. The central problem with this technique was the angle dependence and the unfavourable signal-to-noise ratio, which has been partially overcome with 2D speckle tracking. Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate application of speckle tracking at rest and during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in a normal subject.

Assessing Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Given the fact that survival from revascularisation has only been demonstrated for patients with inducible ischaemia,1 the role of stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is likely to remain important in the future.

DSE has excellent rates of sensitivity and specificity2 and has been widely used for clinical and research purposes in the past. However, DSE has a long learning curve, is relatively subjective and the poor temporal resolution of the human eye is a limitation for the accurate visual assessment of the complex myocardial motion.3 Initial studies using quantitative longitudinal strain rate analysis with TDI during DSE showed high specificity and sensitivity in detecting coronary artery disease.4–6

2D speckle tracking is site specific and angle independent and allows quantitative assessment of longitudinal, transversal, radial and circumferential strain, which cannot be completely appreciated visually.7 This opens new opportunities and even further increases the accuracy of this method in ischaemia assessment.8Figure 3 demonstrates the example of a patient with a circumflex stenosis and ischaemia during DSE with post-systolic contraction of the lateral wall in the recovery period in 2D speckle tracking. In the recovery period, displacement imaging depicts post-systolic contraction of the lateral wall in red.

Speckle tracking does not replace DSE but complements it, as shown in a recently published study in which the combination of longitudinal strain and Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) resulted in a significant incremental increase in diagnostic accuracy.9 Similar findings were found in a recently published study of Reant et al., in which the combination of circumferential and longitudinal strains with DSE resulted in very high rates of sensitivity.10

Non-invasive evaluation of regional deformation using strain rate imaging during DSE predicted the relevance of intermediate coronary stenosis compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR).6

DSE is time consuming and rather impractical in the emergency setting, and a tool to identify patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) would be useful. A recently published study demonstrated that peak systolic longitudinal strain (PSLS) of the left ventricle at rest using 2D speckle tracking was significantly lower in patients with left main or three-vessel CAD without regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) and might be useful for identifying patients with severe CAD.11

Assessing Viability

The identification of myocardial viability is very important as it determines management (revascularisation procedure versus conservative management) and in the meantime significantly affects the prognosis of the patient.12 Different imaging modalities have been used for assessment of myocardial viability in the past and the study group of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently published a report on imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation.13 Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging utilising 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and perfusion tracers,14 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy,15 contrast-enhanced MRI (ceMRI)16 and low-dose DSE17,18 provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and have similar accuracies.

Early studies using speckle tracking showed promising results with sensitivity and specificity rates of 70% to predict viability compared with ceMRI.19 More recent studies report even higher sensitivity and specificity rates for global and regional longitudinal strain assessed with 2D speckle tracking.20 Other investigators have suggested that levosimendan could be superior to dobutamine to predict viability21 and there might still be a role for tissue Doppler techniques.22

Speckle Tracking in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Risk stratification and determination of the time-point of revascularisation remains a challenge in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (non-ST-ACS). Patients with a very high risk can potentially benefit from an aggressive invasive approach23 but identification of these subjects is difficult. Acute ischaemia induced by a balloon occlusion of the coronary artery induces significant reduction of circumferential and radial strain and displacement.24 Brunvand et al. recently published studies using speckle-tracking imaging in patients with non-ST-ACS. Strain echocardiography was shown to predict acute coronary occlusion and was an excellent predictor of final infarct size, raising the hope that patients who would benefit from immediate reperfusion therapy can accurately be identified in the future.25–27

A subgroup of patients will have an increased rate of cardiovascular adverse events after a myocardial infarction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and WMSI have been used for risk stratification in the past. However, both LVEF and WMSI have known limitations such as poor endocardial border definition and poor reproducibility.28 A recent study of 659 patients using speckle-tracking analysis demonstrated that strain and strain rate were significantly related to all-cause mortality (primary end-point) and the composite endpoint of revascularisation, re-infarction and hospitalisation for heart failure. Most importantly, these novel parameters were superior to LVEF and WMSI in the risk stratification for long-term outcome.29 These exciting results, if confirmed in further studies, bear great potential for risk stratification and a more tailored use of invasive assessment in patients with non-ST-ACS.

Use of Speckle Tracking in Asymptomatic Patients

Given the higher sensitivity and specificity, speckle-tracking imaging would be particularly useful in patients who are asymptomatic or in those patients who are found to have normal conventional echocardiographic studies.

Patients with diabetes are very often asymptomatic despite having significant disease and early presentation of CAD and left ventricular dysfunction is not uncommon in this population. Ng et al. used speckle tracking to describe left ventricular myocardial changes in asymptomatic patients with diabetes and demonstrated impaired longitudinal systolic and diastolic function.30 Similar findings were previously shown using exercise tissue Doppler echocardiography.31

A recently published study in children with history of anthracycline therapy demonstrated impaired left ventricular deformation and dyssynchrony despite having normal left ventricular shortening fractions.32 An advantage of strain imaging for detecting subclinical myocardial disease has been shown in several studies of patients with rheumatic diseases.33–35 Due to its non-invasive nature, speckle tracking has the potential to become an important evaluation tool for asymptomatic patients in the future.

Diastolic Dysfunction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure) continues to have a rising incidence and at the same time evidence-based therapy that alters morbidity or mortality is lacking.36 Patients with diastolic dysfunction have a significantly increased risk of morbidity/mortality even in the absence of symptomatic heart failure.37 Traditionally, echocardiography with mitral inflow and pulmonary venous flow pattern and, more recently, tissue Doppler imaging has been used to diagnose and grade diastolic dysfunction. Several studies have assessed the additional benefit of speckle tracking on top of the already-established echocardiographic methods to diagnose diastolic dysfunction. While most studies suggest an advantage of speckle tracking,38–40 other studies have reported that longitudinal, radial and circumferential strain are not different between patients with diastolic dysfunction and control subjects.41

Speckle Tracking in Valve Disease
Aortic Stenosis

In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), lower average longitudinal strain is related to higher left ventricular mass, concentric geometry and more severe AS.42 Interestingly, in severe AS patients, impaired left ventricular strain and strain rate exist although ejection fraction is preserved and aortic valve replacement leads to a significant improvement of strain measures.43,44 Future studies should focus on whether strain imaging can predict left ventricular recovery after valve replacement and whether this can be achieved without DSE.

Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral valve replacement bears a significant amount of morbidity and mortality and prediction of post-operative outcomes would be a useful tool in the identification of those patients who truly benefit from surgery. Lancellotti et al. demonstrated in 2008 that in asymptomatic patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), exercise left ventricular longitudinal contractile recruitment during exercise predicts post-operative left ventricular dysfunction.45 Kim et al. published a paper of 59 patients in 2009 and showed that left- ventricular short-axis function is a useful marker of left ventricular contractility in patients with chronic, severe MR and left ventricular long-axis function becomes depressed earlier in the chronic remodelling process.46

Speckle-tracking echocardiography can be used to predict a decrease in LVEF over the medium term after mitral valve replacement.47

Speckle Tracking to Guide Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV who are on established medical therapy and have a prolonged QRS (>120ms) and a decreased ejection fraction (EF <35%) benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).48 Different echocardiographic techniques have been used in the past to quantify left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and predict patient response.49–51 The Predictors of Responders to Cardiac Dyssynchrony (PROSPECT) study suggested that echocardiographic dyssynchrony, such as tissue Doppler, did not have enough predictive value to challenge routine selection criteria for CRT.

Speckle-tracking echocardiography using radial, circumferential, transverse and longitudinal strain has been successfully employed in several studies to assess dyssynchrony. The recently published Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study was a prospective, multicentre trial and demonstrated that dyssynchrony detected by radial and transverse strains is associated with EF response and long-term outcome following CRT.52 Mechanical dyssynchrony can be widely observed in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex but so far CRT studies in these patients have not been successful. A recent study showed that intraventricular measures of mechanical dyssynchrony using speckle tracking may be useful in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling at six-month follow-up in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex.53

The Future of Echocardiography

In a recent comprehensive review on the future of echocardiography, Marvick points out that quantification and 3D echocardiography (3D echo) will be of great importance in clinical decision-making in the next few years. Automation and quantification are likely to attenuate skill dependence in future years and echocardiography will finally overcome its label of an ‘old technology’.54

3D echo has been shown to be associated with a marked decrease in inter-observer variability compared with 2D even in the assessment of rather complicated structures like the right ventricle.55 We presented normal values and reproducibility of strain parameters derived from 3D speckle tracking of the left ventricle at the Annual Meeting of the ESC in Sweden.56 Left ventricular torsion is the wringing motion of the left ventricle around its long axis and is related to fibre orientation in the sub-epicardial and sub-endocardial wall.57 To be clinically useful it should be quantified as a circumferential–longitudinal shear angle. Therefore, torsion is related to the deformation process within the myocardial wall and may be considered as a marker for cardiac disease. Speckle tracking has been shown to be a technique for quantification of left ventricular torsion and good correlation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies has been demonstrated.8,58 Three-dimensional speckle tracking is a promising tool to overcome the lack of a reference coordinate system in two-dimensional scanning. The expanding role of left ventricular torsion in the analysis of myocardial dysfunction is nicely described in a review by Rüssel et al.59 However, whether this analysis can add to the diagnostic accuracy of a stress test has not clearly been documented so far.

In summary, given the major social and economic importance of CAD for our societies, quick and effective evaluation and management of stable and unstable patients is essential. Testing for myocardial ischaemia using speckle tracking has the potential to become an excellent tool to guide interventional cardiologists as to whether treatment of a coronary stenosis will have an impact on the symptoms and prognosis of patients.

Three-dimensional speckle tracking is likely to emerge as an even more important non-invasive technology in the future. Advantages are that it is widely available (compared with CMR scanners) and does not use ionising radiation (compared with computed tomography [CT] or PET).

References

  1. Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al., Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 2007;297(18):1985–91.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Mahajan N, Polavaram L, Vankayala H, et al., Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative metaanalysis, Heart, 2010;96(12):956–66.
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Kvitting JP, Wigstrom L, Strotmann JM, Sutherland GR, How accurate is visual assessment of synchronicity in myocardial motion? An in vitro study with computersimulated regional delay in myocardial motion: clinical implications for rest and stress echocardiography studies, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1999;12(9):698–705.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Voigt JU, Nixdorff U, Bogdan R, et al., Comparison of deformation imaging and velocity imaging for detecting regional inducible ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography, Eur Heart J, 2004;25(17):1517–25.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Ingul CB, Stoylen A, Slordahl SA, et al., Automated analysis of myocardial deformation at dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiographic validation, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007;49(15):1651–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Weidemann F, Jung P, Hoyer C, et al., Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve, Eur Heart J, 2007;28(12):1425–32.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Reisner SA, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, et al., Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004;17(6):630–3.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Helle-Valle T, Crosby J, Edvardsen T, et al., New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation: speckle tracking echocardiography, Circulation, 2005;112(20):3149–56.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Ng AC, Sitges M, Pham PN, et al., Incremental value of 2- dimensional speckle tracking strain imaging to wall motion analysis for detection of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography, Am Heart J, 2009;158(5):836–44.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Reant P, Labrousse L, Lafitte S, et al., Quantitative analysis of function and perfusion during dobutamine stress in the detection of coronary stenoses: twodimensional strain and contrast echocardiography investigations, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009;23(1):95–103.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Choi JO, Cho SW, Song YB, et al., Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009;10(5):695–701.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Wijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG, Hibernating myocardium, N Engl J Med, 1998;339(3):173–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Underwood SR, Bax JJ, vom Dahl J, et al., Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Report of a Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology, Eur Heart J, 2004;25(10):815–36.
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Sawada SG, Positron emission tomography for assessment of viability, Curr Opin Cardiol, 2006;21(5):464–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Pace L, Perrone-Filardi P, Mainenti P, et al., Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease using rest-redistribution thallium-201 tomography: optimal image analysis, J Nucl Med, 1998;39(11):1869–74.
    PubMed
  16. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, et al., Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000;36(6):1985–91.
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Smart SC, Sawada S, Ryan T, et al., Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography detects reversible dysfunction after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction, Circulation, 1993;88(2):405–15.
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, et al., Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement— Executive Summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC), Eur Heart J, 2009;30(3):278–89.
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Becker M, Hoffmann R, Kuhl HP, et al., Analysis of myocardial deformation based on ultrasonic pixel tracking to determine transmurality in chronic myocardial infarction, Eur Heart J, 2006;27(21):2560–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Roes SD, Mollema SA, Lamb HJ, et al., Validation of echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain imaging for viability assessment in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, Am J Cardiol, 2009;104(3):312–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Cianfrocca C, Pelliccia F, Pasceri V, et al., Strain rate analysis and levosimendan improve detection of myocardial viability by dobutamine echocardiography in patients with post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction: a pilot study, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008;21(9):1068–74.
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Bansal M, Jeffriess L, Leano R, Mundy J, Marwick TH, Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010;3(2):121–31.
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al., Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes, N Engl J Med, 2009;360(21):2165–75.
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Winter R, Jussila R, Nowak J, Brodin LA, Speckle tracking echocardiography is a sensitive tool for the detection of myocardial ischemia: a pilot study from the catheterization laboratory during percutaneous coronary intervention, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2007;20(8):974–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Eek C, Grenne B, Brunvand H, et al., Strain echocardiography predicts acute coronary occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2010;11(6):501–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. Grenne B, Eek C, Sjoli B, et al., Acute coronary occlusion in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: outcome and early identification by strain echocardiography, Heart, 2010;96(19):1550–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Eek C, Grenne B, Brunvand H, et al., Strain echocardiography and wall motion score index predicts final infarct size in patients with non-ST-segmentelevation myocardial infarction, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010;3(2): 187–94.
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Otterstad JE, Froeland G, St John Sutton M, Holme I, Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function, Eur Heart J, 1997;18(3):507–13.
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Antoni ML, Mollema SA, Delgado V, et al., Prognostic importance of strain and strain rate after acute myocardial infarction, Eur Heart J, 2010;31(13):1640–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Ng AC, Delgado V, Bertini M, et al., Findings from left ventricular strain and strain rate imaging in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Am J Cardiol, 2009;104(10):1398–401.
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Ha JW, Lee HC, Kang ES, et al., Abnormal left ventricular longitudinal functional reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus: implication for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction using exercise tissue Doppler echocardiography, Heart, 2007;93(12):1571–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Cheung YF, Hong WJ, Chan GC, et al., Left ventricular myocardial deformation and mechanical dyssynchrony in children with normal ventricular shortening fraction after anthracycline therapy, Heart, 2010;96(14):1137–41.
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Mele D, Censi S, La Corte R, et al., Abnormalities of left ventricular function in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis using Doppler measures of myocardial strain, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008;21(11):1257–64.
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Matias C, Isla LP, Vasconcelos M, et al., Speckle-tracking-derived strain and strain-rate analysis: a technique for the evaluation of early alterations in right ventricle systolic function in patients with systemic sclerosis and normal pulmonary artery pressure, J Cardiovasc Med, 2009;10(2):129–34.
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Buss SJ, Wolf D, Korosoglou G, et al., Myocardial left ventricular dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: new insights from tissue Doppler and strain imaging, J Rheumatol, 2010;37(1):79–86.
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al., Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study, N Engl J Med, 2006;355(3):260–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al., Prediction of risk for first age-related cardiovascular events in an elderly population: the incremental value of echocardiography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003;42(7):1199–205.
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Mu Y, Qin C, Wang C, Huojiaabudula G, Two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging in evaluation of early changes in left ventricular diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension, Echocardiography, 2010;27(2):146–54.
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Galderisi M, Lomoriello VS, Santoro A, et al., Differences of Myocardial Systolic Deformation and Correlates of Diastolic Function in Competitive Rowers and Young Hypertensives: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Study, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2010; 23(11):1190–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Mizuguchi Y, Oishi Y, Miyoshi H, et al., Concentric left ventricular hypertrophy brings deterioration of systolic longitudinal, circumferential, and radial myocardial deformation in hypertensive patients with preserved left ventricular pump function, J Cardiol, 2010;55(1):23–33.
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Narayanan A, Aurigemma GP, Chinali M, et al., Cardiac mechanics in mild hypertensive heart disease: a speckle-strain imaging study, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009;2(5):382–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Cramariuc D, Gerdts E, Davidsen ES, Segadal L, Matre K, Myocardial deformation in aortic valve stenosis: relation to left ventricular geometry, Heart, 2010;96(2):106–12.
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Delgado V, Tops LF, van Bommel RJ, et al., Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement, Eur Heart J, 2009;30(24):3037–47.
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. Lindqvist P, Bajraktari G, Molle R, et al., Valve replacement for aortic stenosis normalizes subendocardial function in patients with normal ejection fraction, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2010;11(7):608–13.
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Lancellotti P, Cosyns B, Zacharakis D, et al., Importance of left ventricular longitudinal function and functional reserve in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation: assessment by two-dimensional speckle tracking, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008;21(12):1331–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Kim MS, Kim YJ, Kim HK, et al., Evaluation of left ventricular short- and long-axis function in severe mitral regurgitation using 2-dimensional strain echocardiography, Am Heart J, 2009;157(2):345–51.
    Crossref | PubMed
  47. de Agustin JA, Perez de Isla L, Nunez-Gil IJ, et al., Assessment of myocardial deformation: Predicting medium-term left ventricular dysfunction after surgery in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation, Rev Esp Cardiol, 2010;63(5):544–53.
    Crossref | PubMed
  48. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al., ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Circulation, 2008;117(21):e350–408.
    Crossref | PubMed
  49. Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, et al., Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004;44(9):1834–40.
    Crossref | PubMed
  50. Gorcsan J 3rd, Kanzaki H, Bazaz R, Dohi K, Schwartzman D, Usefulness of echocardiographic tissue synchronization imaging to predict acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, Am J Cardiol, 2004;93(9):1178–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Yu CM, Chau E, Sanderson JE, et al., Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure, Circulation, 2002;105(4):438–45.
    Crossref | PubMed
  52. Tanaka H, Nesser HJ, Buck T, et al., Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study, Eur Heart J, 2010;31(14):1690–700.
    Crossref | PubMed
  53. van Bommel RJ, Tanaka H, Delgado V, et al., Association of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex, Eur Heart J, 2010. [Epub ahead of print]
  54. Marwick TH, The future of echocardiography, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009;10(5):594–601.
    Crossref | PubMed
  55. Chua S, Levine RA, Yosefy C, et al., Assessment of right ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography improves accuracy and decreases interobserver variability compared with conventional twodimensional views, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009;10(5):619–24.
    Crossref | PubMed
  56. Basagiannis C, Olszweski R, Zuber M, Becher H, Normal values and reproducibility of strain parameters derived from 3D speckle tracking echocardiography, Eur Heart J, 2010;31(Abstract Suppl.):1061–2.
  57. Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH, Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole, Circ Res, 1969;24(3):339–47.
    Crossref | PubMed
  58. van Dalen BM, Soliman OI, Vletter WB, et al., Feasibility and reproducibility of left ventricular rotation parameters measured by speckle tracking echocardiography, Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009;10(5):669–76.
    Crossref | PubMed
  59. Russel IK, Gotte MJ, Bronzwaer JG, et al., Left ventricular torsion: an expanding role in the analysis of myocardial dysfunction, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009;2(5):648–55.
    Crossref | PubMed